AI in the workplace
AI is accelerating claims. Employers still carry the risk. Employees can now generate a Fair...
Restructuring an organisation is never an easy task, but it’s crucial to approach it with care and consideration, especially when it comes to the mental wellbeing of your staff. Mishandling redundancies or organisational changes can lead to a ripple effect of fear, uncertainty, and anxiety among employees, ultimately damaging morale, productivity, and trust. A recent case involving the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) serves as a cautionary tale of what can go wrong. Their poorly managed restructure led to such significant issues that SafeWork NSW had to step in.
In this article, we’ll unpack the details of the UTS case, explore its implications for employers, and provide a roadmap for navigating organisational change with your team’s wellbeing in mind.
UTS recently faced an unusual intervention by SafeWork NSW, which ordered the institution to pause its restructure plans due to a “serious and imminent risk of psychological harm” to staff. Hundreds of employees were left in limbo while the restructure was halted, meetings were cancelled, and staff reported a “culture of fear” linked to uncertainty and job insecurity.
After consultation with health and safety representatives and adjustments to communication processes, the prohibition notice was lifted, allowing UTS to proceed with its restructure.
This case highlights that psychological health is as much a WHS issue as physical safety. Regulators will intervene if poor consultation, communication, or change management practices create risks of stress, anxiety, or other psychosocial harm. Employers can’t assume that financial or strategic decisions sit outside WHS obligations. The process of managing those changes must still protect worker wellbeing.
Employers must actively manage psychosocial risks during periods of significant organisational change. This can include:
This case sends a clear signal that SafeWork regulators are prepared to intervene on psychosocial grounds. For employers, it reinforces that managing mental health risks during organisational change isn’t optional – it’s a legal obligation under WHS law.
While large organisations like UTS often make the headlines, SMEs are equally bound by WHS laws, and are often more vulnerable because they lack big HR teams or in-house safety specialists. Here are some practical, low-cost actions small to medium businesses can take:
Citation Safety has created a unique suite of psychosocial risk management services, Psychosocial Hazard Management, specifically designed to assist businesses that lack the in-house expertise or resources to meet Australia’s stringent WHS laws and employer obligations. With our support, you can have peace of mind knowing your business is compliant and not at risk.
Backed by industry-leading safety experts, these services can aid organisations in meeting WHS obligations and implementing best-practice processes to avoid work-related injuries and illnesses. The team at Citation Safety is ready and waiting to support your business. Contact our friendly team to schedule a confidential, no-obligation chat.
Jack Bowkett is a Workplace Health and Safety Consultant at Citation Group. He has an interest in all things safety-related and regularly provides pragmatic advice on how businesses can comply with their WHS obligations and create a good working environment.